AusBowl

GG all. Well played WTS.

I'm with Olaf, I just don't have the time anymore to dedicate to the boards.

That's what I wanted to hear in so many ways.

You guys have been awesome

Going on Mission #3 with *Fake Brett is a best case scenario for evil Olaf, and a worst case scenario for good Olaf.

Typo there error - fixed here for clarity.

@Hutchie - is it worth failing just to see WTS vote?
We can always run OneEye/Hutch/Foad again...

My thoughts Mission #1 OneEye proposes Olaf and OneEye. -everybody agrees, a bit of a turkey shoot as no-one has information, except for Merlin, who shouldn't reveal at this stage. Mission #1 succeeds. Mission #2 Foad proposes Olaf, OneEye and Foad. -team approved 4-1 -Hutchie dissents as he should ...

Sorry guys stuck at work. Will be on in an hour or two.

Need to read the posts and decide if we should run this group. I'm torn on it.

Is OneEye a Brett? Or is he an Evan?
I'm old and I get confused readily...

Hutchie, I'd suggest that the team you need to propose is OneEye, you and I.

Olaf and OneEye are a bit of a coin flip, but I'd put OneEye up at this stage..

I'm inclined to agree with OneEye.

Hutchie, I'd suggest that the team you need to propose is Brett, you and I.

http://ausbowl.com/ucp.php?i=174

Hide My online status.

As a suggestion for fairness, shall all the good guys agree to turn guest mode off?

Users browsing this forum: Foad and 3 guests

Not sure if I'm willing to trust you with information Hutchie, you're likely to go and see what the end level bad guy has to say :) I mean you may come up with a great team, the winning team - but at this stage I reckon I'm going to reserve the right to knock back what you put up. I know it pains yo...

@Rabid - I think you may have misspelled resound success, based on previous comments by WTS. Can you please check? Also check grammar? Also a little concerned at the ad hominem comment by One Eye at 8:56 yesterday morning, as I know you're a better games than that. But far less so than WTS, as that ...

Wait for it...

I think this team has to be run to collect information. If this team goes and fails, than we know that either you or Olaf are bad guys. If this team passes, then we know I'm a bad guy. If this team goes and fails then we know that: 1), At least one of you two are bad guys 2), both of you could be ba...

Sorry, guys smashed at work.

OneEye + Olaf passing, then OneEye, Olaf + Foad failing can mean 2 things.
The first mission had a bad guy in it and was thrown to confuse.
The first mission didn't have a bad guy and had a bad guy added.

If I'm a good guy, I have to vote this one down either way.

WTS: Hutchie has the lay of it, shame on you for even suggesting that I put you OneEye, Olaf and you as the next team. That would totally say I'm OK with it failing, which would make me a terrible player as I'm clearly a good guy. The trick is with 5-0 agreement on the party, everyone here has to as...

Rabid : What was the vote count on the party formation?

I think it closes when OneEye offically names his party. (In green).

Then we're silent until the vote is announced.

I think... Correct me if I'm wrong Rabid

Dunno. That team might still get up.

If it doesn't, I'd consider suggesting a team with one of them in it (doesn't matter which one).